According to a former royal butler, Prince Harry’s greatest concern about returning to the UK is the potential threat of an attack on the royal family.
Since stepping down as a senior working royal and relocating to the U.S. in 2020, Harry’s relationship with the royal family has become increasingly strained, particularly after he made explosive allegations in his memoir, Spare.
Grant Harrold, who served as King Charles’ butler from 2004 to 2011, claims that Harry is reluctant to return due to security concerns. Following his departure from royal duties, his security detail was reduced, prompting him to take legal action against the UK government.
However, the High Court ruled against him, with Judge Sir Peter Lane stating there was no unlawful action in revising his security arrangements. Despite the loss, Harry intends to appeal the decision.
Harrold believes that Harry’s fears are tied to his controversial standing with the British public and the possibility of an attack.
“Harry’s biggest worry about coming back is the risk of someone targeting him or his family because of the love-hate dynamic between him and the public,” he explained.
He further added, “He will always have that concern in the back of his mind. This is likely the main reason he avoids returning, but it’s also about his family. Without the necessary protection in the UK, he is understandably worried about assassination attempts on himself or his loved ones.”
In a 2023 High Court statement, Harry emphasized that he wants his children to “feel at home” in the UK, but that won’t be possible if he cannot ensure their safety. He has previously expressed sorrow over leaving the UK in 2020, citing security concerns as a key factor.
During an interview with ITV last year, Harry reflected on his decision not to return, saying
“It’s still dangerous, and all it takes is one lone actor—one person who believes what they read—to act on it.”
Harrold also weighed in on the debate over whether Harry should receive state-funded security or cover the costs himself. “Being a member of the royal family was not his choice,” he stated, arguing that Harry should have security access, much like former prime ministers.
However, he acknowledged the opposing viewpoint, questioning whether taxpayers should fund Harry’s protection if he no longer carries out royal duties. “On the other hand, he is paying for his security in the U.S., so could he not do the same while in the UK?” he added.
